[Geopriv] Comments on the Civil-02 ID (on CA Types)

From: James M. Polk ^lt;jmpolk@cisco.com>
Date: Fri Jul 02 2004 - 17:39:21 EDT

In reviewing the pidf-lo-02 and the civil-02 IDs, I have discovered minor

Specifically with the unnamed or labeled chart (which should be, BTW) on
page 9 and 10 of civil-02 -- it is less complete than the chart in
pidf-lo-02 ID recently submitted by Jon Peterson that's in IETF LC.

pidf-lo-02 references "PC" for 'Postal Code' and "FLR" for 'Floor' in that
ID's chart (on its page 6 and 7, that is also not labeled, which it should
be for outside referencing to it).

I believe the two charts should be consistent to each other, with the
civil-02 ID being the one that's less complete, it should have the
appropriate text added.


                 Truth is not to be argued... it is to be presented

Geopriv mailing list
Received on Fri, 02 Jul 2004 16:39:21 -0500

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Jul 02 2004 - 18:01:02 EDT