RE: [Geopriv] Use of common policy in conferencing: a question about transformations

From: hisham.khartabil@nokia.com
Date: Tue Jul 06 2004 - 09:07:55 EDT

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ext Tschofenig Hannes [mailto:hannes.tschofenig@siemens.com]
> Sent: 06.July.2004 16:02
> To: Khartabil Hisham (Nokia-TP-MSW/Helsinki); geopriv@ietf.org
> Subject: RE: [Geopriv] Use of common policy in conferencing:
> a question
> about transformations
>
>
> hi hisham
>
> i try to getter a better understanding of the raised issue.
>
> how should i understand this transformation?
> "
> <transformations>
> <is-floor-moderator
> floor-control="floor-id">true</is-key-participant>
> </transformations>
> "
>
> what does the 'floor-control="floor-id"' part mean?
> what is the 'floor-id'?

The user identified in the identity element is transformed into a floor moderator. The 'floor-control' attribute carries the floor id that this identity is a moderator of.

The real question is: Can I have an attribute in the transformation?

>
> shouldn't it read:
>
> <transformations>
> <is-floor-moderator
> floor-control="floor-id">true</is-floor-moderator>
> </transformations>

Oops, copy-paste error. Sorry about that.

/Hisham

>
>
> ciao
> hannes
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: hisham.khartabil@nokia.com
> [mailto:hisham.khartabil@nokia.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2004 1:53 PM
> > To: geopriv@ietf.org
> > Subject: [Geopriv] Use of common policy in conferencing: a
> > question about transformations
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > As some of you may know, there was consensus in the last XCON
> > WG interim meeting that we adopt a common-policy-like
> > approach to conferencing. Once example use case of that is a
> > user (identity) can transformed into a conference floor
> > moderator. For example:
> >
> > <rule id="2">
> > <conditions>
> > <identity>
> > <id>alice@example.com</id>
> > </identity>
> > </conditions>
> > <actions>
> > <allow-sidebar>true</allow-sidebar>
> > </actions>
> > <transformations>
> >
> > <is-floor-moderator>true</is-key-participant>
> > </transformations>
> > </rule>
> >
> > The issue is that Alice now needs to be assigned a floor,
> > using a floor ID. There are 2 ways of doing so:
> >
> > 1. In the conference policy where floors are specified, have
> > the moderator ID, as follows:
> >
> > <floor
> > floor-control="fcp://example.com/floorabc"
> > moderator-controlled="true">
> > ...
> >
> > <moderator-uri>sip:alice@example.con</moderator-uri>
> > </floor>
> >
> > I don't like this approach since much of the information is
> repeated.
> >
> > 2. In the rule, specify the floor ID:
> >
> > <rule id="2">
> > <conditions>
> > <identity>
> > <id>alice@example.com</id>
> > </identity>
> > </conditions>
> > <actions>
> > <allow-sidebar>true</allow-sidebar>
> > </actions>
> > <transformations>
> > <is-floor-moderator
> > floor-control="floor-id">true</is-key-participant>
> > </transformations>
> > </rule>
> >
> > In this approach, the transformation also carries the floor
> > ID of the floor.
> >
> > The question is: is it acceptable to carry such information
> > in a transformation element?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Hisham
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Geopriv mailing list
> > Geopriv@ietf.org
> > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
> >
>

_______________________________________________
Geopriv mailing list
Geopriv@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
Received on Tue, 6 Jul 2004 16:07:55 +0300

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Jul 06 2004 - 10:31:15 EDT