Re: [Geopriv] SIP Location Conveyance -03 submitted

From: Andrew Newton ^lt;andy@hxr.us>
Date: Thu Jun 29 2006 - 22:28:48 EDT

On Jun 29, 2006, at 7:28 PM, James M. Polk wrote:
>
> I've had the SIP WG chairs bitch at me that this ID isn't getting
> the necessary attention in the SIP WG (during a massive thread on
> the Geopriv list), and were considering dropping the ID from their
> milestones. They asked that this ID get discussed on the SIP
> list. They do not subscribe to the Geopriv list, thus I'm kinda
> caught in the middle, with ECRIT (seriously) waiting on this doc to
> progress too.
>
> I wouldn't mind if the WG chairs from SIP, Geopriv and ECRIT get
> together and make a decision where this is to be discussed. I
> don't care. I just want this doc to progress.
>
> Any help you can provide would be greatly appreciated!

If the SIP wg co-chairs believe this document is not getting the
necessary review in the SIP wg, then this document should be moved
over to GEOPRIV.

Are there any objections to this?

-andy

_______________________________________________
Geopriv mailing list
Geopriv@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
Received on Thu, 29 Jun 2006 22:28:48 -0400

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Jun 29 2006 - 22:57:16 EDT