Re: [Geopriv] SIP Location Conveyance -03 submitted

From: Andrew Newton ^lt;>
Date: Thu Jun 29 2006 - 22:28:48 EDT

On Jun 29, 2006, at 7:28 PM, James M. Polk wrote:
> I've had the SIP WG chairs bitch at me that this ID isn't getting
> the necessary attention in the SIP WG (during a massive thread on
> the Geopriv list), and were considering dropping the ID from their
> milestones. They asked that this ID get discussed on the SIP
> list. They do not subscribe to the Geopriv list, thus I'm kinda
> caught in the middle, with ECRIT (seriously) waiting on this doc to
> progress too.
> I wouldn't mind if the WG chairs from SIP, Geopriv and ECRIT get
> together and make a decision where this is to be discussed. I
> don't care. I just want this doc to progress.
> Any help you can provide would be greatly appreciated!

If the SIP wg co-chairs believe this document is not getting the
necessary review in the SIP wg, then this document should be moved
over to GEOPRIV.

Are there any objections to this?


Geopriv mailing list
Received on Thu, 29 Jun 2006 22:28:48 -0400

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Jun 29 2006 - 22:57:16 EDT