Re: [Geopriv] SIP Location Conveyance -03 submitted

From: Hannes Tschofenig ^lt;Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net>
Date: Fri Jun 30 2006 - 02:57:07 EDT

I support your idea.

Andrew Newton wrote:
>
> On Jun 29, 2006, at 7:28 PM, James M. Polk wrote:
>
>>
>> I've had the SIP WG chairs bitch at me that this ID isn't getting the
>> necessary attention in the SIP WG (during a massive thread on the
>> Geopriv list), and were considering dropping the ID from their
>> milestones. They asked that this ID get discussed on the SIP list.
>> They do not subscribe to the Geopriv list, thus I'm kinda caught in
>> the middle, with ECRIT (seriously) waiting on this doc to progress too.
>>
>> I wouldn't mind if the WG chairs from SIP, Geopriv and ECRIT get
>> together and make a decision where this is to be discussed. I don't
>> care. I just want this doc to progress.
>>
>> Any help you can provide would be greatly appreciated!
>
>
> If the SIP wg co-chairs believe this document is not getting the
> necessary review in the SIP wg, then this document should be moved over
> to GEOPRIV.
>
> Are there any objections to this?
>
> -andy
>
> _______________________________________________
> Geopriv mailing list
> Geopriv@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
>
>

_______________________________________________
Geopriv mailing list
Geopriv@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
Received on Fri, 30 Jun 2006 08:57:07 +0200

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Jun 30 2006 - 03:18:03 EDT