Re: [Sip] Re: [Geopriv] rethinking data:

From: Jeroen van Bemmel ^lt;>
Date: Fri Aug 25 2006 - 20:43:53 EDT


A data: URI enables the following use case: location-by-value inserted by a
Especially for emergency cases, location-by-value is good to have: less
delay (no additional de-reference) and less ways in which things can fail.
Although I'm not particularly keen on the syntax defined for data: URIs, I
think the use case and benefits it enables are worthwhile



----- Original Message -----
From: "Andrew Newton" <>
To: "James M. Polk" <>
Cc: "GEOPRIV" <>; "IETF SIP List" <>
Sent: Saturday, August 26, 2006 2:21 AM
Subject: [Sip] Re: [Geopriv] rethinking data:

> On Aug 25, 2006, at 6:01 PM, James M. Polk wrote:
>> At 04:08 PM 8/25/2006 -0400, Andrew Newton wrote:
>>> Having reviewed the archives
>> Andy
>> Which archives did you review?
>> There were several voices opposed to it, but maybe not on the Geopriv
>> list. After all, this is a SIP doc...
> I'm well aware of that fact, James. However, there was actually very
> little significant discussion on it besides the exchange between Henning
> and myself (there was a post on the SIP list that never made it to
> GEOPRIV that was in favor). Keep in mind, this was mixed into a long and
> winding thread.
> So, here we have another thread. And it would be easy for those opposed
> (or for) to stand up and be counted (and offer an explanation, too...
> after all, we don't vote in the IETF).
> -andy
> _______________________________________________
> Sip mailing list
> This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
> Use for questions on current sip
> Use for new developments on the application of sip

Geopriv mailing list
Received on Sat, 26 Aug 2006 02:43:53 +0200

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Aug 25 2006 - 21:25:09 EDT