Re: [Sip] RE: [Geopriv] rethinking data:

From: Andrew Newton ^lt;andy@hxr.us>
Date: Fri Aug 25 2006 - 23:14:25 EDT

On Aug 25, 2006, at 10:17 PM, Dawson, Martin wrote:

> Beats me Henning (and not that I understand the shape-shifting
> allusion
> either).
>
> Andy just said
>
> "So, here we have another thread. And it would be easy for those
> opposed (or for) to stand up and be counted (and offer an explanation,
> too... after all, we don't vote in the IETF)."
>
> So I responded in the spirit of the request as someone who is for
> reference conveyance.
>
> Don't know where you'd get the idea I wanted by-value removed.
> That'd be
> silly.

Martin,

I have to confess that I read your message in much the same way
Henning did. In fact, I was about to reply with "Why do you believe
the data: URL is to the exclusion of any other URL type?" Thanks for
clearing this up.

I was speaking specifically about the usage of the data: URL.

-andy

_______________________________________________
Geopriv mailing list
Geopriv@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
Received on Fri, 25 Aug 2006 23:14:25 -0400

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Aug 25 2006 - 23:34:23 EDT