Re: [Geopriv] WGLC on draft-ietf-geopriv-l7-lcp-ps-00 (PIDF-LO digital signatures)

From: Andrew Newton ^lt;andy@hxr.us>
Date: Tue Feb 13 2007 - 15:51:01 EST

On Feb 13, 2007, at 3:33 PM, jerome.grenier@bell.ca wrote:

> It seems to me that many non-working group documents of Geopriv
> have the potential for a promotion, especially the ones that have
> been sitting there for months. With official milestones in the
> range of early 2005, I wonder what the criteria for promoting them
> to active working group documents are. From my perspective, many
> core issues inherent to the Geopriv charter are not yet formally
> addressed through working group documents.

Well, we did attempt to update the milestones. We are currently in
negotiations with our AD.

The only document that is "lingering" is revised-civic, and I've
already apologized to the authors for the delay.

-andy

_______________________________________________
Geopriv mailing list
Geopriv@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
Received on Tue, 13 Feb 2007 15:51:01 -0500

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Feb 13 2007 - 15:51:50 EST