Re: [Geopriv] "A Uniform Resource Identifier for Geographic Locations ('geo' URI)"

From: Hannes Tschofenig ^lt;Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net>
Date: Sat Feb 24 2007 - 11:54:08 EST

Section 6.2. reads a slightly different version of the not yet finished
attempt to standardize
http://www.potaroo.net/ietf/all-ids/draft-daviel-html-geo-tag-05.txt and
Section 6.3 sounds like an incomplete SIP Location Conveyance approach.

The argument of the document that existing mechanisms "don't provide a
generic way to protocol independent location identification." seems
pretty dubious given that the URI definition alone does not provide
enough semantic (unless you read all the way through Section 6 where the
semantic is hinted based on examples).

Ciao
Hannes

Henning Schulzrinne wrote:
> In case you haven't seen this:
>
> Title : A Uniform Resource Identifier for Geographic Locations
> ('geo' URI)
> Author(s) : A. Mayrhofer, C. Spanring
> Filename : draft-mayrhofer-geo-uri-00.txt
> Pages : 13
> Date : 2007-2-23
>
> It mentions SIP as an application. This is not an endorsement or
> critique of the proposal, just FYI.
>
> Henning
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Geopriv mailing list
> Geopriv@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv

_______________________________________________
Geopriv mailing list
Geopriv@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
Received on Sat, 24 Feb 2007 17:54:08 +0100

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Feb 24 2007 - 12:01:57 EST