Re: [Geopriv] Location in SIP and "retransmission-allowed"

From: Henning Schulzrinne ^lt;hgs@cs.columbia.edu>
Date: Wed May 09 2007 - 08:06:14 EDT

I don't care if the new draft 'updates' 4119, given that 4119 is
hardly a model of clarity. I care that we not get stuck into
inventing useless headers, although this seems to be a losing battle.

On May 9, 2007, at 1:46 AM, Winterbottom, James wrote:

> *Ding Dong*
>
> I will chime in to the effect that I think the wording in 4119 is very
> clear on this and that I side with Richard and Ted.
>
> On how we solve it I don't have that strong opinion on whether we
> change
> 4119 (I think that 4119 could use some other changes too), or we
> introduce a new header I am agnostic. But I don't think that the
> current
> wording in 4119 allows querying of a LoST server by a proxy.
>
> Cheers
> James
>

_______________________________________________
Geopriv mailing list
Geopriv@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
Received on Wed, 9 May 2007 08:06:14 -0400

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed May 09 2007 - 08:06:41 EDT