Re: [Geopriv] WGLC: draft-ietf-geopriv-http-location-delivery-09.txt

From: Thomson, Martin ^lt;Martin.Thomson@andrew.com>
Date: Mon Sep 29 2008 - 19:41:48 EDT

The user did ask for that side-effect, or at least had to be prepared for that side-effect.

In any case, Lisa's point that idempotence is more important than "safe"-ness (if I've interpreted her correctly), is more to the point.

Cheers,
Martin

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Julian Reschke [mailto:julian.reschke@gmx.de]
> Sent: Tuesday, 30 September 2008 9:25 AM
> To: Thomson, Martin
> Cc: Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo); GEOPRIV
> Subject: Re: [Geopriv] WGLC: draft-ietf-geopriv-http-location-delivery-
> 09.txt
>
> ...
>
> The default request of locationType=any
> could result in the creation of a location URI if server policy
> dictated this.
>
> In which case the user didn't ask for that side-effect, right?
>
> BR, Julian

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message is for the designated recipient only and may
contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information.
If you have received it in error, please notify the sender
immediately and delete the original. Any unauthorized use of
this email is prohibited.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[mf2]
_______________________________________________
Geopriv mailing list
Geopriv@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
Received on Mon, 29 Sep 2008 18:41:48 -0500

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Sep 29 2008 - 19:42:44 EDT