Re: [Geopriv] [dhcwg] Last Call: <draft-ietf-geopriv-dhcp-lbyr-uri-option-15.txt> (Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) IPv4 and IPv6 Option for a Location Uniform Resource Identifier (URI)) to Proposed Standard

From: Ted Lemon ^lt;mellon@fugue.com>
Date: Wed Jun 27 2012 - 18:02:14 EDT

On Jun 27, 2012, at 11:27 PM, Alissa Cooper wrote:
> If we split it into two options, that eliminates the future possibility of supporting multiple URIs per client. So we will need to take this back to the GEOPRIV WG to make sure folks are okay with foreclosing that.

The document already says that multiple URIs aren't valid, doesn't it?

_______________________________________________
Geopriv mailing list
Geopriv@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
Received on Thu, 28 Jun 2012 00:02:14 +0200

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Jun 27 2012 - 18:04:46 EDT